Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Brandon Nakashima vs Camilo Ugo Carabelli Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nakashima vs Carabelli analysis and find out who is favored!
Brandon Nakashima vs Camilo Ugo Carabelli Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nakashima has won 56.39% of points on his second serve, while Carabelli has won 48.21%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nakashima, in recent form, has won 47.64% of his opponent's second serve points, while Carabelli has won 56.6%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.66% and 34.81% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nakashima has saved 69.95% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Carabelli has saved 61.11% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nakashima has won 60.98% of matches played (W/L 50/ 32), with Carabelli winning 68% (W/L 51/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nakashima has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 72% (W/L 54/ 21), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 26/ 25). Carabelli has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 287/ 157), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Nakashima has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 76.32% of matches (W/L 29/ 9), where as Carabelli has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 74.14% of matches (W/L 43/ 15). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Nakashima winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Nakashima winning 2 and Carabelli winning 0. The last match between Nakashima and Carabelli was at the Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid, 23-04-2024, Q3, Clay with Brandon Nakashima getting the victory 7-6(4) 7-6(6).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:13:43.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Nakashima and Carabelli have played a deciding set 0 times, with Nakashima winning 0 times and Carabelli 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Nakashima winning 2, and Carabelli 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nakashima has played against opponents with an average rank of 225.22 while Carabelli has played against players with an average rank of 275.17.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nakashima has won 41% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Carabelli has won 68% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nakashima has converted 34% of breakpoint opportunities, and Carabelli has converted 46.25% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Nakashima 1 - 0 Carabelli
72
Rank
43
High
22
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
107
Rank
96
High
24
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
Form
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
61% (190-119)
Career Total W/L
63% (316-182)
71% (32-13)
YTD W/L
69% (27-12)
$1,648,985
Career Prize Money
$130,440
1
YTD Titles
2
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Brandon Nakashima | Camilo Ugo Carabelli |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 14 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 7 | 5 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:13:43 | 2:13:43 |
| 1st Serve % | 74% (57/77) | 65% (59/91) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 86% (49/57) | 76% (45/59) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 65% (13/20) | 69% (22/32) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| Return Points W% | 26% (24/91) | 19% (15/77) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(4) 7-6(6) |
Stats 
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
74%
(
57 of
77)
1st Serve %
65%
(
59 of
91)
7
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
0
86%
(
49 of
57)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
45 of
59)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
0%
(
0 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
15 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
24 of
91)
86
Total Points Won
82
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Brandon Nakashima | Camilo Ugo Carabelli |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 71% (32/13) | 69% (27/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 66% (66/34) | 63% (56/33) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (556/471) | 54% (476/400) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 73% (11/4) | 67% (2/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 67% (10/5) | 69% (25/11) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 73% (11/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.68 | 0.22 |
| Aces Total | 341 | 92 |
| DFs per game | 0.13 | 0.19 |
| DFs Total | 66 | 82 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:49:41 | 2:1:34 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 269.22 | 237.62 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (2094/3246) | 63% (1793/2838) |
| 1st Serve W% | 75% (1563/2094) | 68% (1213/1793) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 57% (653/1152) | 49% (510/1045) |
| BPs Won% Total | 33% (93/278) | 46% (145/312) |
| Return Pts W% | 37% (1245/3383) | 43% (1217/2862) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 67% (2/1) |
| Masters W/L | 64% (7/4) | 33% (1/2) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 67% (4/2) | 43% (3/4) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 78% (21/6) | 81% (21/5) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 70% (31/44) | 68% (25/37) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (16/24) | 53% (10/19) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (8/12) | 73% (8/11) |
| 1st set W, W | 90% (30/27) | 100% (23/23) |
| 1st set W, L | 10% (30/3) | 0% (23/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 29% (14/4) | 25% (16/4) |
Brandon Nakashima Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Miomir Kecmanovic
Player
Brandon Nakashima
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
73%
(
19 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
26%
(
16 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
21 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Jesper De Jong
49%
(
42 of
85)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
98)
6
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
42 of
59)
70%
(
30 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
26 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
37 of
98)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Nerman Fatic
53%
(
39 of
74)
1st Serve %
65%
(
56 of
86)
3
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
6
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
41 of
56)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
20 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
30 of
86)
84
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Francisco Comesana
64%
(
65 of
101)
1st Serve %
70%
(
57 of
82)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
41 of
57)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
37%
(
37 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
28 of
82)
92
Total Points Won
91
|
7-5 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Roman Safiullin
Player
Brandon Nakashima
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
60%
(
46 of
77)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
77%
(
17 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
77)
75
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Pedro Martinez Portero
56%
(
61 of
108)
1st Serve %
69%
(
68 of
99)
16
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
40 of
68)
38%
(
18 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
46%
(
50 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
48 of
99)
106
Total Points Won
101
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Facundo Bagnis
Player
Brandon Nakashima
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve %
73%
(
58 of
80)
5
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
0
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
40 of
58)
71%
(
20 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
10%
(
1 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
17 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
28 of
80)
78
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
74%
(
57 of
77)
1st Serve %
65%
(
59 of
91)
7
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
0
86%
(
49 of
57)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
45 of
59)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
0%
(
0 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
15 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
24 of
91)
86
Total Points Won
82
|
7-6(4) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Reda Bennani
69%
(
61 of
89)
1st Serve %
68%
(
69 of
101)
12
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
77%
(
47 of
61)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
38 of
69)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
34%
(
30 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
51 of
101)
110
Total Points Won
80
|
6-1 6-7(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Brandon Nakashima
67%
(
62 of
93)
1st Serve %
62%
(
77 of
125)
6
Aces
14
3
Double Faults
0
77%
(
48 of
62)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
53 of
77)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
31 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
46 of
125)
108
Total Points Won
110
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Camilo Ugo Carabelli Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
12
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
76
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Luciano Darderi
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
39%
(
14 of
36)
1st Serve %
46%
(
25 of
54)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
86%
(
12 of
14)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Taro Daniel
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve %
57%
(
45 of
79)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
55%
(
16 of
29)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
54%
(
30 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
45 of
79)
71
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
74%
(
57 of
77)
1st Serve %
65%
(
59 of
91)
7
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
0
86%
(
49 of
57)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
45 of
59)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
0%
(
0 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
15 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
24 of
91)
86
Total Points Won
82
|
7-6(4) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
57%
(
43 of
75)
1st Serve %
68%
(
60 of
88)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
24 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
88)
89
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve %
54%
(
56 of
103)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
37 of
56)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
12%
(
2 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
20 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
45 of
103)
95
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
59%
(
50 of
85)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
85)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Orlando Luz
60%
(
50 of
83)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
89)
5
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
70%
(
23 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
33 of
89)
85
Total Points Won
87
|
1-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
76%
(
50 of
66)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
20 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Nicolas Zanellato
77%
(
55 of
71)
1st Serve %
68%
(
57 of
84)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
81%
(
13 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
22 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
44 of
84)
93
Total Points Won
62
|
6-1 6-7(6) 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Nakashima Vs Carabelli Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Brandon Nakashima
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
